temp: move to atomfs with fixed umount #654
Draft
+5
−11
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mikemccracken
requested review from
rchincha,
smoser and
hallyn
as code owners
|
Converted to draft because we shouldn't merge this, we should wait until atomfs merges atomfs#27 and then update to the main repo |
do not merge. Signed-off-by: Michael McCracken <[email protected]>
mikemccracken
force-pushed
the
2024.12.02/main/atomfs-top
branch
2 times, most recently
from
7eb9274 to
81a78db
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
see project-machine/atomfs#27
The MetadataPath field in the MountOCIOpts struct is not needed anymore, if left empty it will use /run/atomfs/ for all mounts.
The atomfs.bats file is not passing locally even though the equivalent test does pass in atomfs#27. Creating this PR to see if it passes in jenkins. It is something about the base image's verity device being in use. I suspect another test is not unmounting the shared base busybox image - maybe we need to isolate the tests better here, or just delete the atomfs test in stacker because it's covered in atomfs now
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.